Talk:Administrative units of Pakistan

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrative units of Pakistan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

February 2004

List numbering doesn't work for me (I am using Konqueror 3.1) - instead of numbering 1-8 I get 1-4, 1-2 and 1-2. Is anybody else having this problem as well? --Peterlin 09:03, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

It works fine here with Mozilla 1.5. The numbering is done with a simple

<ol start=2>

which should be a standard HTML command to do a numbered list with an offset. So this must be a bug in your browser that it ignores the "start" command. andy 09:08, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Proposed merger

The entire content of the article on Provinces and territories of Pakistan can be found on the Subdivisions of Pakistan article. I propose the two be merged with a redirect at the Provinces and territories page. Green Giant 13:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmir POV

Argh, an anonymous IP keeps reverting the opening, which I think this pretty carefully neutrally worded, into a sentence that doesn't even make sense ("In addition, the portion of Kashmir is divided into two separate administrative units."). I don't want to get into a 3rv block with him, but can someone else jump in here? He's arguing that this page can't acknowledge the fact that Kashmir is disputed unless the corresponding India page does (though he seems so far to not have taken up my suggestion to edit the India page). --Jfruh (talk) 01:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article was moved from Administrative divisions

There seems to have been little common agreement between editors on what to call this article. Some of the titles make a lot of sense but there are good reasons not adopt them:

Administrative divisions of Pakistan and Political divisions of Pakistan have the potential to cause confusion with the tier of government called Divisions of Pakistan which existed between the provincial and district level and were only abolished in 2000 but now seem to be restored. One also has to bear in mind that the federal and provincial governments insist on using the word "division" to describe the components of their ministries e.g. Railways division etc.
Provinces of Pakistan and Pakistani province are only suitable for half of the top tier i.e. we need to include the four less autonomous units (ICT, FATA, Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir).
Provinces and territories of Pakistan does not work because only the Islamabad Capital Territory is officially a territory.
Subdivisions of Pakistan and Regions of Pakistan imply it is a unitary state but officially Pakistan is a federation.
Provinces and federally administered areas of Pakistan does not work because the "federally administered areas" is too close to "Federally Administered Tribal Areas" but not close enough to the other three smaller units.

As a result I believe it is better to use the term that the government of Pakistan uses in the official census - Administrative Units, with a small "u" for the word "units". Green Giant (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

population of Pakistan

Unless I have made a mistake, the population of Pakistan differs from the sum of the population of each of the units by exactly 4,773,000. Is there a reason for this? ~~July 06, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.65.197 (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC) Wht isn't it a exact number? Why is it a percent? That's very vague. Do you expect people to find it themselves?$200inaire (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2012 (UTC)$200inaire[reply]

Tagged for update ...

... because it still talks about the 4-tier system with divisions, which Districts of Pakistan says were abolished in August 2000. At least one of them needs updating. --Stfg (talk) 13:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

email addresses of all heads of departments should be given.

Assalam-o-alaikum:-For instance, I want to send emails to the District Accounts' Officer 1,FAISALABAD; BUT HIS EMAIL ADDRESS IS NOT AVAILABLE;email addresses of all heads of departments should be given.I have an earnest piece of work with the said officer; I am an heart patient aged about 71; a pensioner.I want to send an email to him.I need not hide any thing. Sincerely Yours,'Muhammad Ayyub Son of Hafiz Muhammad Hussain,Retired Associate Professor of Zoology,Government College ,Dhobighat/Government College University,FAISALABAD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.186.177.237 (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Administrative units of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Administrative units of Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090720052328/http://www.fata.gov.pk/ to http://www.fata.gov.pk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of Balochistan.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Balochistan in Pakistan (claims hatched).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:07, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Provinces and territories of Pakistan

Someone should include both the provinces and

the territories in the table Flags200 (talk) 18:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following sources describe Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan as "dependent territories":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Azad_Kashmir

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunza_District

50.111.110.138 (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting information

In the table, the info-bubble for "Sindh" describes is as "one of the four provences of Pakistan."

The map and the table, however, show seven provences of Pakistan.

Which is it: four, or seven? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 20:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Four provinces, three regions which are not provinces. DS (talk) 16:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 July 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Template:Pakistan Administrative Units Image Map to administrative divisons section in article for easy navigation as well. The Story of Marjaan (talk) 10:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Where should this be added? Does it really add anything to the article as it stands? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 July 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

EditWiki45 (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The current map is not suitable under the guidelines and is not valid in UN also as well as the territory shown is not contolled by pakistan plz look into it and talk to me if you have any questions EditWiki45 (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 January 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Multan is in punjab region so count it as once. Lahore is capital of punjab Leoheroofficial (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lightoil (talk) 08:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Geo graphy for grade 6

What type of work do the people do in all province and territories of Pakistan

103.137.24.211 (talk) 11:27, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baluchi and Brahvi Language

Baluchi is a widely spoken language in Pakistan's province of Balochistan as well as Iran's Balochistan. Similarly Brahvi is also spoken by millions of people in Balochistan. Unfortunately both languages have no place in Wikipedia. So it is necessary that both languages should be placed on Wikipedia menu. Abunara (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed map

The map of the princely states is erroneous as it does not include the princely state of Swat. A different map needs to be found to illustrate the princely states of Pakistan at independence as that one is inaccurate. Ecrm87 (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]